A Detailed Comparison of the Sigma 16mm 1.4 and Fuji 16mm 2.8 Lenses

BySolidarity Project Blog

The Fuji 16mm 2.8 is the better lens, as it has a wider aperture with improved low-light performance.

Sigma 16Mm 1.4 Vs Fuji 16Mm 2.8

The Sigma 16mm 1.4 and the Fuji 16mm 2.8 are both high-quality wide-angle lenses, offering excellent sharpness and clarity for a variety of shots. However, they do differ in certain characteristics. The Sigma is a much larger and heavier lens than the Fuji, and it offers a slightly wider field of view and faster aperture at 1.4 compared to Fuji’s 2.8. With its large aperture, the Sigma is ideal for low light photography, while the Fuji offers faster autofocus along with optical image stabilization capabilities. In terms of price, the Sigma is certainly more expensive than the Fuji but in terms of performance both lenses will provide remarkable results for those seeking wide angle photography needs.

Sigma 16Mm 1.4

The Sigma 16mm 1.4 is a wide-angle prime lens designed for full-frame DSLR cameras and APS-C digital mirrorless cameras. It has a maximum aperture of f/1.4 and a minimum focusing distance of 9.8 inches (25 cm). The lens features an Optical Stabilization System that minimizes camera shake, allowing for sharper images, even in low-light conditions. It also includes a Super Multi-Layer Coating to reduce flare and ghosting, as well as to improve contrast and color fidelity in images.

Lens Specifications

The Sigma 16mm 1.4 has an 11 blade diaphragm that helps create beautiful bokeh effects, while the 9 rounded aperture blades help to produce smooth out-of-focus highlights. The lens also features an Internal Focus system for fast and quiet autofocusing, as well as a manual focus override option. The lens construction consists of 15 elements in 11 groups, including three glass mold elements and two aspherical elements for improved sharpness and reduced chromatic aberration. The filter size is 77mm with the lens weighing in at 400g (14oz).

Pros and Cons

The main pros of the Sigma 16mm 1.4 are its fast maximum aperture, Optical Stabilization System, Super Multi-Layer Coating, Internal Focus system, lightweight design, and low distortion. On the other hand, some of its cons are its high price tag, large filter size for some cameras models, lack of weather sealing on some models, and limited zoom range when used with APS-C cameras.

Fuji 16Mm 2.8

The Fuji 16mm 2.8 is a wide angle prime lens designed specifically for Fujifilm X mount digital mirrorless cameras such as the X100F or X-T20/30 series of cameras. It has a maximum aperture of f/2.8 with a minimum focusing distance of 9 inches (23 cm). This lens offers excellent corner sharpness throughout its entire focal range thanks to both its Aspherical Lens Elements and Super EBC Coating on all lens elements which helps reduce flare and ghosting while also increasing contrast levels in images taken with this lens.

Lens Specifications

This Fuji wide angle prime lens offers an 11 blade diaphragm which helps create beautiful bokeh effects along with 7 rounded aperture blades which help produce smooth out-of-focus highlights when shooting wide open at f/2.8 or stopped down to smaller apertures such as f/8 or f/11 for greater depth of field control when needed . The construction consists of 12 elements in 9 groups including 3 Aspherical Lens Elements plus one ED Element which helps minimize chromatic aberrations for improved sharpness across the entire image frame . Additionally this Fuji prime lens features an internal focusing system with manual focus override option along with filter sizes ranging from 40mm up to 62mm depending on the camera model used .

Pros and Cons

The main pros of this Fuji prime are its relatively small size compared to other lenses in this category , excellent corner sharpness , effective Super EBC Coating on all lenses , internal focusing system , lightweight design , good build quality , relatively low price tag compared to other lenses in this category , plus its versatile enough to be used both indoors or outdoors . On the other hand some of its cons include its limited zoom range when compared to other lenses in this category , lack of weather sealing on some models , along with somewhat noisy autofocus motor when using manual focus override option .

Performance Comparison Image Quality

Both lenses offer excellent image quality thanks to their low distortion optical designs with both the Sigma 16mm 1:4 offering slightly better performance overall due to its faster maximum aperture value along with Optical Stabilization System helping improve image quality even further especially when shooting handheld at slower shutter speeds . In terms of corner sharpness both lenses perform similarly although the Fuji does have the edge thanks its Aspherical Lens Elements combined with effective Super EBC coating helping reduce chromatic aberrations across entire image frame .

Features & Design Comparison

In terms of features & design both lenses offer similar advantages such as an internal focusing system plus manual focus override options however where they differ is in their overall construction & weight whereby the Sigma being slightly larger & heavier than its Fuji counterpart due mostly due its larger filter size along with Optical Stabilization System whereas the Fuji being slightly more compact & lightweight thanks its smaller filter size combined with less complex optical design making it easier handle especially if one is traveling light .

Durability Comparison Build Quality

When looking at build quality between these two lenses we can see that both offer similar advantages such as dust & moisture resistance however where they differ is mostly down to their materials used whereby the Sigma being constructed from metal alloy & polycarbonate plastic materials offering greater durability & protection compared to Fuji counterpart which uses mainly metal alloy materials providing good protection but not quite up there same level as Sigma model .

Price Comparison Retail Pricing Both lenses offer similar price points depending on where purchased although generally speaking you can expect pay just under $700 USD retail price point for either model making them affordable options within their respective categories although if budget isnt an issue then obviously you would be better off opting for higher priced model like Sigma due its superior performance specs overall .

< h 2 > Value For Money When comparing these two lenses side by side one must consider not only their individual performance specs but also how much value each offers relative cost so ultimately if budget isn’t issue then we would suggest opting for higher priced model like Sigma due superior performance specs however if budget tight then certainly no shame going cheaper option like Fuji since will still get excellent results from either model regardless choice made here .

Usability Comparison

When it comes to usability, the Sigma 16mm 1.4 and Fuji 16mm 2.8 lenses both have some advantages and disadvantages. The Sigma is a bit more portable, as it weighs only 5 oz (140 g), while the Fuji weighs 8 oz (227 g). This can make a big difference when you’re lugging your gear around all day. In terms of operational efficiency, both lenses offer fast autofocus speeds and precise image stabilization, but the Fuji’s superior image quality makes it slightly more efficient overall.

Autofocus Comparison

The autofocus systems on both lenses are very fast and accurate, but the Fuji’s autofocus system has one notable advantage over the Sigma: continuous autofocus ability. This allows you to track moving subjects with ease, which is especially useful for sports and wildlife photography. The Sigma’s autofocus system is still great for most types of photography though.

Video Recording Capabilities Comparison

When it comes to video recording capabilities, both lenses offer excellent quality results. The Sigma has a slight edge in terms of master quality of video recording, thanks to its higher resolution sensor and faster aperture speed. The AF performance while video recording is also better on the Sigma than on the Fuji, as it can keep up with fast-moving subjects more easily.

Low Light Performance Comparison

Both lenses are great for taking photos in low light conditions, but there are some subtle differences between them when it comes to brightness of images and low light focusing ability. The Fujifilm lens offers slightly brighter images due to its larger maximum aperture of f/2.8 compared to the Sigma’s f/1.4 aperture. On the other hand, the Sigma is better at low light focusing due to its ultra-fast AF motor which allows for quick and accurate focusing in dark conditions.

FAQ & Answers

Q: What are the lens specifications of the Sigma 16Mm 1.4?
A: The Sigma 16Mm 1.4 features a maximum aperture of f/1.4, a minimum aperture of f/16, a angle of view of 83.2, and a minimum focusing distance of 0.20m.

Q: What are the lens specifications of the Fuji 16Mm 2.8?
A: The Fuji 16Mm 2.8 features a maximum aperture of f/2.8, a minimum aperture of f/22, an angle of view of 83, and a minimum focusing distance of 0.25m.

Q: How does the image quality compare between Sigma and Fuji lenses?
A: In general, the Sigma 16Mm 1.4 offers better image quality than the Fuji 16Mm 2.8 due to its wider maximum aperture and faster autofocus capabilities in low light conditions.

Q: How does the durability compare between Sigma and Fuji lenses?
A: Both lenses feature robust build quality with weather sealing on their bodies; however, the Sigma lens is constructed from more durable materials which can withstand more wear and tear over time than the Fuji lens can.

Q: How does their price compare between Sigma and Fuji lenses?
A: The Sigma 16Mm 1.4 is more expensive than the Fuji 16Mm 2.8, with an approximate retail price difference between them being around $500 USD or more depending on where you purchase them from.

The Sigma 16mm 1.4 and the Fuji 16mm 2.8 are both great lenses for wide-angle photography. The Sigma offers a wider maximum aperture of f/1.4, making it ideal for low-light shooting and shooting with shallow depth of field. The Fuji lens, on the other hand, is more pocketable and lightweight at half the size of the Sigma, making it easier to travel with. Ultimately, you should choose the lens that best suits your needs and desired results.

Author Profile

Solidarity Project
Solidarity Project
Solidarity Project was founded with a single aim in mind - to provide insights, information, and clarity on a wide range of topics spanning society, business, entertainment, and consumer goods. At its core, Solidarity Project is committed to promoting a culture of mutual understanding, informed decision-making, and intellectual curiosity.

We strive to offer readers an avenue to explore in-depth analysis, conduct thorough research, and seek answers to their burning questions. Whether you're searching for insights on societal trends, business practices, latest entertainment news, or product reviews, we've got you covered. Our commitment lies in providing you with reliable, comprehensive, and up-to-date information that's both transparent and easy to access.